Authors
James Boettcher
Saint Joseph's University of Pennsylvania
Abstract
Is it permissible for a citizen or political official to exercise coercive political power on the basis of a political justification associated with a religiously motivatedconception of justice? In this paper I accept John Rawls’s general approach to this question, but attempt to show how the Rawlsian approach is more inclusive ofreligious reasoning than many have supposed. My paper focuses specifically on the 1986 Catholic bishops’ pastoral letter on the U.S. economy. The bishops’ letter is certainly part of what Rawls calls a “comprehensive doctrine.” But, as I argue in the paper, the letter is also consistent with political liberalism’s core idea of reasonableness, supports a reasonable political conception of justice and satisfies the Rawlsian “proviso” concerning the public-political use of religious argument. From the standpoint of political liberalism, the bishops’ letter may be interpreted as a form of public reason.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Conference Proceedings  History of Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0065-7638
DOI acpaproc20037730
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,739
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

“Political, Not Metaphysical”.James W. Boettcher - 2003 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:205-219.
Why is the Bishops' Letter on the U.S. Economy so Unconvincing?William S. Reece - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (7):553 - 560.
What is Reasonableness?James Boettcher - 2004 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (5-6):597-621.
The Ethics of Reasoning From Conjecture.Micah Schwartzman - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (4):521-544.
Justice: Metaphysical, After All? [REVIEW]Ryan W. Davis - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (2):207-222.
Pluralism, Imagination, and Estrangement.Lisa Rivera - 2006 - Philosophical Papers 35 (3):327-365.
Introduction: Convergence Justifications in Public Reason.Kevin Vallier - 2011 - Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (4):257-260.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-17

Total views
5 ( #1,104,292 of 2,340,252 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #188,811 of 2,340,252 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes