Still impossible after all these years: Reply to Caplan

Critical Review 17 (1-2):155-170 (2005)

Abstract Socialism is strictly ?impossible.? Its impracticability is not, as Bryan Caplan has suggested, a ?quantitative? matter, nor does he show that real?world socialism's incentive problems outweighed its informational ones. Caplan's criticism of Ludwig von Mises's critique of the ?possibility? of socialism fails to appreciate what he meant by ?socialism? and misunderstands Mises's argument about economic calculation. History, too, suggests that socialism's informational deficiency was the most significant problem facing those who tried to implement socialism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/08913810508443633
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,330
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Is Socialism Really “Impossible”?Bryan Caplan - 2004 - Critical Review 16 (1):33-52.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
36 ( #251,966 of 2,286,072 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #319,399 of 2,286,072 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature