Age-weighting

Economics and Philosophy 24 (2):167-189 (2008)
Abstract
Some empirical findings seem to show that people value health benefits differently depending on the age of the beneficiary. Health economists and philosophers have offered justifications for these preferences on grounds of both efficiency and equity. In this paper, I examine the most prominent examples of both sorts of justification: the defence of age-weighting in the WHO's global burden of disease studies and the fair innings argument. I argue that neither sort of justification has been worked out in satisfactory form: age should not be taken into account in the framework of the burden of disease measure, and on the most promising formulations of the fair innings argument, it turns out to be merely an indicator of some other factor. I conclude by describing the role of age in theories of justice of healthcare resource allocation
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S026626710800179X
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,122
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
The Value of Life.John Harris - 1985 - Routledge & Kegan Paul.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Complete Lives in the Balance.Samuel J. Kerstein & Greg Bognar - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):37 – 45.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
37 ( #142,913 of 2,191,269 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #291,146 of 2,191,269 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature