Philosophical Issues 5:117-131 (1994)
AbstractThe question whether we can have a priori knowledge, and if so to what extent, has lain at the center of philosophy practically since the beginning. For many philosophers, including Plato, Leibniz, Kant, Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein and most of the Logical Positivists, to name just a few, it seems to have been the problem around which everything else was made to turn. It's an interesting question why philosophers have been so obsessed with this problem and why they have been inclined to assign it so much importance. One reason, no doubt, has to do with its relation to the possibility of philosophy itself. Although it has become fashionable in some circles to pretend otherwise, I don't really see that anyone out there has much idea how analytic philosophy is to be done, if not a priori; in particular, I don't really see that anyone has much idea how it is to be done without a hefty helping of a priori conceptual analysis....
Similar books and articles
Synonymy Without Analyticity.Roger Wertheimer - 1994 - International Philosophical Preprint Exchange.
Analyticity and incorrigibility.Manuel Campos - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):689-708.
Analyticity and implicit definition.Kathrin Glüer - 2003 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):37-60.
Analyticity and logical truth in The roots of reference.Susan Haack - 1977 - Theoria 43 (2):129-143.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Understanding and philosophical methodology.Magdalena Balcerak Jackson & Brendan Balcerak Jackson - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 161 (2):185-205.
Toward a Theory of Concept Mastery: The Recognition View.Gabriel Oak Rabin - 2020 - Erkenntnis 85 (3):627-648.
Counterfactually robust inferences, modally ruled out inferences, and semantic holism.Pietro Salis - 2016 - AL-Mukhatabat (16):111-35.
A defence of the evolutionary debunking argument.Man Him Ip - 2021 - Dissertation, University of Birmingham
References found in this work
No references found.