After Substance: How Aristotle’s Question Still Bears on the Philosophy of Chemistry

Philosophy of Science 73 (5):853-863 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article will explore whether there are arguments for Aristotle's concept mixis which can aid our current discussions within the philosophy of chemistry. We remain troubled by the way and extent to which chemical substance in bulk can be identified with or reduced to the stability and structure of molecules, and whether these in turn can be identified with or reduced to elemental atoms and the quantum theoretical characterization of their electrons. Aristotle was as determined as we are to think through the implications of substances comprised of constituents and to question their status in chemical compounds.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Nature of Substance.Ian J. Thompson - 1988 - Cogito 2 (2):17-19.
Substances.S. Marc Cohen - 2009 - In Georgios Anagnostopoulos (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle. Oxford, UK: Blackwell-Wiley. pp. 197–212.
What is a chemical property?Nalini Bhushan - 2007 - Synthese 155 (3):293 - 305.
Aristotle on Substance and Unity.Hye-Kyung Kim - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:79-91.
Substance and Independence in Aristotle.Phil Corkum - 2013 - In B. Schnieder, A. Steinberg & M. Hoeltje (eds.), Varieties of Dependence: Ontological Dependence, Supervenience, and Response-Dependence. Basic Philosophical Concepts Series, Philosophia Verlag. pp. 36-67.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
146 (#123,760)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations