Dharmakīrtian Inference

Journal of Indian Philosophy 51:591-609 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dharmakīrti argues that there is no pramāṇa (valid means of cognition or source of knowledge) for a thesis that is a self-contradiction (svavacanavirodha). That is, self-contradictions such as ‘everything said is false’ and ‘my mother is barren’ cannot be known to be true or false. The contemporary scholar Tillemans challenges Dharmakīrti by arguing that we can know that self-contradictions are false by means of a formal logical inference. The aims of the paper are to answer Tillemans’ challenge from what we take to be Dharmakīrti’s or Dharmakīrtian (someone who is like Dharmakīrti) perspective and to demonstrate the unique features of Dharmakīrti’s view of inference. By so doing, we show that the epistemology in relation to the formal conception of logic that underlies Tillemans’ challenge is problematic from Dharmakīrti’s or Dharmakīrtian perspective. The paper, thus, presents Dharmakīrti’s view of inference and logical reasoning as well as a Dharmakīrtian challenge to the formal conception of logic that is the dominant contemporary conception.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

The Theory of Nigrahasthāna in Vādanyāya of Dharmakīrti.Gan Wei & Chen Zhixi - forthcoming - History and Philosophy of Logic:1-15.
Buddhist Philosophy of Logic.Koji Tanaka - 2013 - In Emmanuel Steven Michael (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Buddhist Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 320-330.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-07

Downloads
601 (#45,333)

6 months
145 (#31,395)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Szymon Bogacz
Australian National University
Koji Tanaka
Australian National University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references