Does Philosophy Matter? -- It Would Appear So. A Reply to Fish

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,651
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Does Fish Welfare Matter? On the Moral Relevance of Agency.Frederike Kaldewaij - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):63-74.
The Use and Abuse of Legal Theory: A Reply to Fish.Carol Isaacson Barash - 1989 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 15 (2):183-197.
Functional Specification and Fish Swimming Backward: Reply to Arno Wouters.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):294-298.
The Interests of Fish: A Reply to Chipaniuk and List.Dionys de Leeuw - 1998 - Environmental Ethics 20 (2):219-220.
The Mysteries of Self-Locating Belief and Anthropic Reasoning.Nick Bostrom - 2003 - The Harvard Review of Philosophy 11 (1):59-73.
Natural Freedom.Daniel Dennett - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 36 (4):449-459.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

166 ( #27,733 of 2,169,417 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

9 ( #35,145 of 2,169,417 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums