Epistemic analyticity: A defense

Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):15-35 (2003)

Authors
Paul Boghossian
Princeton University (PhD)
Abstract
The paper is a defense of the project of explaining the a priori via the notion of meaning or concept possession. It responds to certain objections that have been made to this project—in particular, that there can be no epistemically analytic sentences that are not also metaphysically analytic, and that the notion of implicit definition cannot explain a priori entitlement. The paper goes on to distinguish between two different ways in which facts about meaning might generate facts about entitlement—inferential and constitutive. It concludes by outlining a theory of the latter.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/18756735-90000810
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,692
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Linguistic Convention and Worldly Fact.Brett Topey - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (7):1725-1752.
On Epistemic Conceptions of Meaning: Use, Meaning and Normativity.Daniel Whiting - 2009 - European Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):416-434.
Philosophy Without Intuitions? A Reply to Cappelen.Paul Boghossian - 2014 - Analytic Philosophy 55 (4):368-381.
Implicit Definition and the Application of Logic.Thomas Kroedel - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (1):131-148.

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Implicit Thoughts: Quine, Frege and Kant on Analytic Propositions.Verena Mayer - 2003 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):61-90.
Analyticity, Meaning and Paradox.Gillian Kay Russell - 2004 - Dissertation, Princeton University
An a Posteriori Conception of Analyticity?Åsa Maria Wikforss - 2003 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):119-139.
Analyticity Reconsidered.Paul Artin Boghossian - 1996 - Noûs 30 (3):360-391.
Analyticity and Implicit Definition.Kathrin Glüer - 2003 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):37-60.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
320 ( #15,304 of 2,328,129 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #178,429 of 2,328,129 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature