Is Meaning Normative?

In Nimtz Christian & Beckermann Ansgar (eds.), Philosophy – Science – Scientific Philosophy. Main Lectures and Colloquia of GAP.5, Fifth International Congress of the Society for Analytical Philosophy, Bielefeld, 22–26 September 2003. Paperborn. pp. 205-218 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The claim that meaning is a normative notion has become very influential in recent philosophy: in the work of many philosophers it plays a pivotal role. Although one can trace the idea of the normativity of meaning at least as far back as Kant, much of the credit for its recent influence must go to Saul Kripke who made the thesis a centerpiece of his much-admired treatment of Wittgenstein’s discussion of rule-following and private language....

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
631 (#26,078)

6 months
27 (#107,910)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Boghossian
New York University

Citations of this work

The normativity of meaning defended.Daniel Whiting - 2007 - Analysis 67 (2):133-140.
No norm for (off the record) implicatures.Javier González de Prado - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Should I believe all the truths?Alexander Greenberg - 2020 - Synthese 197 (8):3279-3303.

View all 67 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Wittgenstein on rules and private language.Saul A. Kripke - 1982 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 173 (4):496-499.
Wittgenstein on following a rule.John McDowell - 1984 - Synthese 58 (March):325-364.
The normativity of content.Paul A. Boghossian - 2003 - Philosophical Issues 13 (1):31-45.

View all 8 references / Add more references