- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Is the Reality Criterion Analytic?
Erkenntnis 86 (6):1445-1451 (2021)
Abstract
Tim Maudlin has claimed that EPR’s Reality Criterion is analytically true. We argue that it is not. Moreover, one may be a subjectivist about quantum probabilities without giving up on objective physical reality. Thus, would-be detractors must reject QBism and other epistemic approaches to quantum theory on other grounds.Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
On the meaning of EPR’s Reality Criterion.Gábor Hofer-Szabó & Márton Gömöri - 2021 - Synthese 199 (5-6):13441-13469.
The Reality of the Wavefunction: Old Arguments and New.Harvey Brown - 2019 - In Alberto Cordero, Philosophers Look at Quantum Mechanics. Springer Verlag.
Phenomenology and Qbism: New Approaches to Quantum Mechanics.Philipp Berghofer & Harald A. Wiltsche (eds.) - 2023 - New York, NY: Routledge.
Back to Kant! QBism, phenomenology, and reality-construction from invariants.Florian Boge - 2023 - In Philipp Berghofer & Harald A. Wiltsche, Phenomenology and Qbism: New Approaches to Quantum Mechanics. New York, NY: Routledge.
Quantum Mechanics, Can It Be Consistent with Locality?Giuseppe Nisticò & Angela Sestito - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (7):1263-1278.
Quantum Mechanics Between Ontology and Epistemology.Florian J. Boge - 2018 - Cham: Springer (European Studies in Philosophy of Science).
QBism, phenomenology, and contextual quantum realism.И. Е Прись - 2023 - Siberian Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):13-42.
After Qbism, Contextual Quantum Realism (Response to C. Fuchs’s Question).Francois-Igor Pris - 2023 - ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУКИ 3 (98):143-165.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-10-22
Downloads
92 (#254,337)
6 months
9 (#612,671)
2019-10-22
Downloads
92 (#254,337)
6 months
9 (#612,671)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
On the meaning of EPR’s Reality Criterion.Gábor Hofer-Szabó & Márton Gömöri - 2021 - Synthese 199 (5-6):13441-13469.
The Positive Argument Against Scientific Realism.Florian J. Boge - 2023 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 54 (4):535-566.
No-go theorems: What are they good for?Radin Dardashti - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 86 (C):47-55.
References found in this work
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky & Nathan Rosen - 1935 - Physical Review (47):777-780.
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox.J. S. Bell - 2004 - In John Stewart Bell, Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics: collected papers on quantum philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 14--21.
Subjective probability and quantum certainty.Carlton M. Caves, Christopher A. Fuchs & Rüdiger Schack - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (2):255-274.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6dc498764b-mjz88 uwo