The case against epistemic relativism: Replies to Rosen and Neta

Episteme 4 (1):49-65 (2007)
Abstract
Unlike the relativistic theses drawn from physics, normative relativisms involve relativization not to frames of reference but to something like our standards, standards that we have to be able to think of ourselves as endorsing or accepting. Th us, moral facts are to be relativized to moral standards and epistemic facts to epistemic standards. But a moral standard in this sense would appear to be just a general moral proposition and an epistemic standard just a general epistemic proposition. Pulling off either relativism, then, requires not just relativizing the facts in the domain in question to the relevant standards; it requires taking a non-absolutist view of the standards themselves. Otherwise a commitment to absolute truths in the domain in question will show up in one’s attitude towards the standards themselves. But it is very hard to see how to take a genuinely non-absolutist attitude towards the standards themselves. That, in essence, is the difficulty for a relativistic view of a normative domain that I tried to develop in Chapter 6 of Fear of Knowledge. In their commentaries, Gideon Rosen and Ram Neta come up with ingenious ways of attempting to circumvent that difficulty. In my reply, I try to explain why I don’t believe they succeed
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3366/epi.2007.4.1.49
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,178
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Fear of Relativism? [REVIEW]Crispin Wright - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 141 (3):379 - 390.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Metaepistemology and Divine Revelation.Andrei Buckareff - 2009 - Heythrop Journal 50 (1):85-90.
What is Relativism?Paul Boghossian - 2006 - In Patrick Greenough & Michael Lynch (eds.), Truth and Relativism. Clarendon Press. pp. 13--37.
Moral and Epistemic Open-Question Arguments.Chris Heathwood - 2009 - Philosophical Books 50 (2):83-98.
Epistemic Relativism and Reasonable Disagreement.Alvin Goldman - 2009 - In Richard Feldman & Ted Warfield (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford University Press.
Knowledge Attributions and Relevant Epistemic Standards.Dan Zeman - 2010 - In Recanati François, Stojanovic Isidora & Villanueva Neftali (eds.), Context Dependence, Perpsective and Relativity. Mouton de Gruyter.
In Defense of Epistemic Relativism.Ram Neta - 2007 - Episteme 4 (1):30-48.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

192 ( #22,422 of 2,163,853 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #188,913 of 2,163,853 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums