Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (2):179-200 (2014)

James Bohman
PhD: Boston University; Last affiliation: Saint Louis University
This article investigates the status of Norbert Elias’s conception of the sociology of knowledge as the means to provide a new epistemological security for sociology. The author of the article argues that this translates into an effective critique of the underlaboring model of the relationship between philosophy and the social sciences, which is consistent with Elias’s attempt to consolidate his own sociological theory. Nevertheless, the author argues that Elias’s sociology of knowledge runs into problems in its attempt to evade the problem of relativism in explanation, and in its conception of human agency.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0048393113510467
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,564
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On Post-Philosophical Sociology: A Reply to Richard Kilminster.Philip Walsh - 2015 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (4-5):508-514.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
16 ( #671,246 of 2,533,577 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #390,861 of 2,533,577 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes