Ontology, Epistemology, and Multimethod Research in Political Science

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (1):73-99 (2013)

Authors
James Bohman
Saint Louis University
Abstract
Epistemologies and research methods are not free of metaphysics. This is to say that they are both, supported by, and support fundamental ontologies. A discussion of the epistemological foundations of “multimethod” research in the social sciences—in as much as such research claims to unearth “causal” relations—therefore cannot avoid the ontological presuppositions or implications of such a discussion. But though there isn’t necessarily a perfect correspondence between ontology, epistemology, and methodology, they do constrain each other. As such it is possible to make methodological choices that are at odds with one’s ontology or argue from an ontology that is inconsistent one’s choice of methods. Yet lack of recognition of this fact has hampered methodological discussions in political science, especially with respect to the discussion on the merits of multimethod research. The ontology implicitly accepted in such discussions is “reductionist” and “regularist,” that is, one that respectively defines causes in terms of noncausal relations and states of affair and affirms that such noncausal relations are regularities in nature. This article will argue that any attempt to fit “multimethod” research within this narrow ontology is destined to fail since such a metaphysics logically cannot accord case studies a necessary or sufficient role in the in the establishment of causal relations. However, there are metaphysical positions within the ambit of an empiricist philosophy of science that can accommodate multiple methods without contradiction. The article discusses two such ontologies and suggests ways in which they might allow the establishment of a coherent epistemological foundation for multimethod research, however, within a decidedly empiricist philosophy of science.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0048393111415380
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,883
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mechanisms and Method.Daniel Little - 2015 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (4-5):462-480.
Beyond the Two-Sciences Settlement.Laura Ephraim - 2013 - Political Theory 41 (5):710-737.
A Method of Intuition: Becoming, Relationality, Ethics.Rebecca Coleman - 2008 - History of the Human Sciences 21 (4):104-123.
An Ontology of Technology: Artefacts, Relations and Functions.Clive Lawson - 2008 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 12 (1):48-64.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-19

Total views
13 ( #614,094 of 2,266,261 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #850,735 of 2,266,261 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature