Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (4):459-480 (1999)
A hallmark of recent critical social science has been the commitment to methodological and theoretical pluralism. Habermas and others have argued that diverse theoretical and empirical approaches are needed to support informed social criticism. However, an unresolved tension remains in the epistemology of critical social science: the tension between the epistemic advantages of a single comprehensive theoretical framework and those of methodological and theoretical pluralism. By shifting the grounds of the debate in a way suggested by Dewey's pragmatism, the author argues that a thoroughgoing pluralism strengthens, rather than weakens, both the social scientific and political aims of critical social science. Not only does pragmatism offer a plausible interpretation of the epistemic pluralism of the social sciences, but it also provides a way of thinking about their fundamentally practical and political character. With a better normative vocabulary with which to discuss the epistemological issues of such a pluralistic mode of inquiry, the democratic role of critical inquiry and its specifically practical form of verification can be clarified.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Dialectical Vs. Experimental Method: Marcuse's Review of Dewey's Logic: The Theory of Inquiry.Phillip Deen - 2010 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (2):242-257.
The Hermeneutics of the Causal Powers of Meaningful Objects.Amit Ron - 2010 - Journal of Critical Realism 9 (2):155-171.
Hermeneutical Injustice and the Social Sciences: Development Policy and Positional Objectivity.James McCollum - 2012 - Social Epistemology 26 (2):189-200.
Power: A Pragmatist, Deliberative (and Radical) View.Amit Ron - 2008 - Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (3):272-292.
Philosophical Research and Educational Action Research.Marianna Papastephanou - 2006 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 40 (2):187–203.
Similar books and articles
The Political Philosophy of Walzer's Social Criticism.J. Gregory - 2010 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (9):1093-1111.
Indeterminacy, Empirical Evidence, and Methodological Pluralism.Joseph Rouse - 1991 - Synthese 86 (3):443 - 465.
Evidence for Use: Causal Pluralism and the Role of Case Studies in Political Science Research.S. Crasnow - 2011 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (1):26-49.
Pluralism and Naturalism: Why the Proliferation of Theories is Good for the Mind.Christopher J. Preston - 2005 - Philosophical Psychology 18 (6):715 – 735.
The Very Idea of Social Epistemology: What Prospects for a Truly Radical 'Radically Naturalized Epistemology'?Steve Woolgar - 1991 - Inquiry 34 (3 & 4):377 – 389.
Politicizing Brandom's Pragmatism: Normativity and the Agonal Character of Social Practice.Thomas Fossen - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):371-395.
De-Ontologizing the Debate on Social Explanations: A Pragmatic Approach Based on Epistemic Interests. [REVIEW]Van Bouwel Jeroen & Weber Erik - 2008 - Human Studies 31 (4):423-442.
Pluralism, Indeterminacy and the Social Sciences: Reply to Ingram and Meehan. [REVIEW]James Bohman - 1997 - Human Studies 20 (4):441-458.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads80 ( #62,108 of 2,143,561 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #386,856 of 2,143,561 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.