- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
From bias to sound intuiting: Boosting correct intuitive reasoning
Cognition 211 (C):104645 (2021)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Smart System 1: evidence for the intuitive nature of correct responding on the bat-and-ball problem.Bence Bago & Wim De Neys - 2019 - Thinking and Reasoning 25 (3):257-299.
On being drawn to different types of arguments: a mouse-tracking study.Annika M. Svedholm-Häkkinen & Mika Hietanen - forthcoming - Thinking and Reasoning.
Confirmation bias emerges from an approximation to Bayesian reasoning.Charlie Pilgrim, Adam Sanborn, Eugene Malthouse & Thomas T. Hills - 2024 - Cognition 245 (C):105693.
Deliberation is (probably) triggered and sustained by multiple mechanisms.Gordon Pennycook - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e137.
A note on an unexpected anchoring bias in intuitive statistical inference.Patricia Lovie - 1985 - Cognition 21 (1):69-72.
Unifying theories of reasoning and decision making.Brett K. Hayes, Rachel G. Stephens & John C. Dunn - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e126.
Examining the role of deliberation in de-bias training.Esther Boissin, Serge Caparos & Wim De Neys - 2024 - Thinking and Reasoning 30 (2):327-355.
Are we good at detecting conflict during reasoning?Gordon Pennycook, Jonathan A. Fugelsang & Derek J. Koehler - 2012 - Cognition 124 (1):101-106.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-03-05
Downloads
20 (#900,549)
6 months
15 (#312,391)
2021-03-05
Downloads
20 (#900,549)
6 months
15 (#312,391)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Advancing theorizing about fast-and-slow thinking.Wim De Neys - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e111.
The formation and revision of intuitions.Andrew Meyer & Shane Frederick - 2023 - Cognition 240 (C):105380.
Fast & slow decisions under risk: Intuition rather than deliberation drives advantageous choices.Aikaterini Voudouri, Michał Białek & Wim De Neys - 2024 - Cognition 250 (C):105837.
Debiasing thinking among non-WEIRD reasoners.Esther Boissin, Mathilde Josserand, Wim De Neys & Serge Caparos - 2024 - Cognition 243 (C):105681.
Examining the role of deliberation in de-bias training.Esther Boissin, Serge Caparos & Wim De Neys - 2024 - Thinking and Reasoning 30 (2):327-355.
References found in this work
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition Advancing the Debate.Jonathan Evans & Keith E. Stanovich - 2013 - Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (3):223-241.
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?Keith E. Stanovich & Richard F. West - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):645-665.
The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Steven A. Sloman - 1996 - Psychological Bulletin 119 (1):3-22.
Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning.Gordon Pennycook & David G. Rand - 2018 - Cognition 188 (C):39-50.
The Smart System 1: evidence for the intuitive nature of correct responding on the bat-and-ball problem.Bence Bago & Wim De Neys - 2019 - Thinking and Reasoning 25 (3):257-299.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-56b8889cb4-pth5s uwo