Grotiana 41 (2):282-303 (2020)

Authors
Camilla Boisen
University of Johannesburg
Abstract
This article investigates the formal purpose of declaring wars for Hugo Grotius. Grotius was adamant that states always use justification in a duplicitous way to conceal their real motivation to go to war. As such, the purpose of declaration is not to assert the just cause of war. Rather, what any public declaration does, is provide recognition that confers legal validation to the disputing parties. The legal rules of war were described by the law of nations and occasionally permitted states to commit certain ‘war crimes’ with impunity. For Grotius, this was not a moral sanctioning of such crimes but rather a means to prevent the occurrence of wars, which such endless repudiations risked causing or exacerbating. Grotius’s concern for the effects of war is conspicuous; and recounting his maxim that war should always be a last resort, this article argues that declaration of war has a distinct moral purpose for Grotius. In fact, public declaration of war is, together with constraints on the conduct of war, a ‘principle of moderation’ Grotius insists should be upheld in times of war. Declaration of war gives the parties avenues to seek peace and reconciliation, and, therefore has a humanitarian purpose for Grotius by ultimately seeking to prevent the disparaging effects of war. Even in wars that do not demand a public declaration, such as those regulated by natural law such as punitive wars or defensive wars, Grotius cautions that declarations of war are advisable. The remaining lingering issue is how to engage with unlawful enemy combatants, such as pirates - a distinct problem that the international community still faces with increasing regularity. Grotius was certainly aware of the legal consequences of recognising belligerency we cannot possible hope to build moral relations with, and, this article claims, ‘unlawful’ enemies ultimately demarcates the boundary of international society.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/18760759-41020003
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,464
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Grotius, Hugo.Andrew Blom - 2014 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Grotius on Natural Law and Supererogation.Johan Olsthoorn - 2019 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 57 (3):443-469.
Hugo Grotius, Moral Scepticism and the Use of Arguments in Utramque Partem.Hugo Grotius - 2011 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 56 (3):145-166.
Grotius’ Theory of Natural Law.Jelena Govedarica - 2015 - Filozofija I Društvo 26 (2):436-457.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-12-22

Total views
8 ( #1,010,708 of 2,520,426 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,555 of 2,520,426 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes