Coleman's Hypothesis on trusting behaviour and a remark on meta‐studies

Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (4):469-483 (2006)
Coleman (1990) describes ?calculative trust?. He states that, in order to trust, the value of trust has to be larger than the value of mistrust. So if subjects have (not personally but on average) rational expectations about the trustworthiness of their transaction partners, we should expect the frequency of trust to increase with the average net profitability of trust. In a meta?study of trust experiments, Coleman's Hypothesis could not be confirmed while, in our own experiment with a wider parameter range, it is supported. We explain this finding by the parameter choices of experimenters. They choose pay?off parameters resulting in situations where decisions are ?difficult?, i.e. to make the alternatives ?trusting? and ?non?trusting? seem equally profitable. Thus, such experiments are concentrated on a specific subspace of parameters and are inadequate for certain meta?studies.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/13501780601049061
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,174
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Challenge of Representative Design in Psychology and Economics.Robin M. Hogarth - 2005 - Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (2):253-263.
Rewarding Trust: An Experimental Study. [REVIEW]Friedel Bolle - 1998 - Theory and Decision 45 (1):83-98.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Rewarding Trust: An Experimental Study. [REVIEW]Friedel Bolle - 1998 - Theory and Decision 45 (1):83-98.
Making the Technological Trustworthy.S. D. Noam Cook - 2010 - Knowledge, Technology and Policy 23 (3-4):455-459.
On the Emotional Character of Trust.Bernd Lahno - 2001 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (2):171-189.
Trustworthiness is a Social Norm, but Trusting is Not.C. Bicchieri, E. Xiao & R. Muldoon - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (2):170-187.
Trust and the Trickster Problem.Zac Cogley - 2012 - Analytic Philosophy 53 (1):30-47.
Deciding to Trust, Coming to Believe.Richard Holton - 1994 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (1):63 – 76.
It’s Not About Technology.Joseph C. Pitt - 2010 - Knowledge, Technology and Policy 23 (3-4):445-454.
Trusting Virtual Trust.Paul B. de Laat - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (3):167-180.
Trusting Our Selves to Technology.Asle H. Kiran & Peter-Paul Verbeek - 2010 - Knowledge, Technology and Policy 23 (3-4):409-427.
Trusting Experts and Epistemic Humility in Disability.Anita Ho - 2011 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (2):102-123.
Creating Trust.Robert C. Solomon - 1998 - Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (2):205-232.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
11 ( #408,781 of 2,180,057 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #305,690 of 2,180,057 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums