Authors
Agnes Bolinska
University Of Cambridge
Joseph D. Martin
Durham University
Abstract
Objections to the use of historical case studies for philosophical ends fall into two categories. Methodological objections claim that historical accounts and their uses by philosophers are subject to various biases. We argue that these challenges are not special; they also apply to other epistemic practices. Metaphysical objections, on the other hand, claim that historical case studies are intrinsically unsuited to serve as evidence for philosophical claims, even when carefully constructed and used, and so constitute a distinct class of challenge. We show that attention to what makes for a canonical case can address these problems. A case study is canonical with respect to a particular philosophical aim when the features relevant to that aim provide a reasonably complete causal account of the results of the historical process under investigation. We show how to establish canonicity by evaluating relevant contingencies using two prominent examples from the history of science: Eddington’s confirmation of Einstein’s theory of general relativity using his data from the 1919 eclipse and Watson and Crick’s determination of the structure of DNA.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.05.003
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,391
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Canonical Naming Systems.Leon Horsten - 2004 - Minds and Machines 15 (2):229-257.
A Case Study in Evolutionary Contingency.Zachary D. Blount - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 58:82-92.
Contingency and History.Kim Sterelny - 2016 - Philosophy of Science 83 (4):521-539.
Is Failure an Option? Contingency and Refutation.Allan Franklin - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (2):242-252.
Scientific Realism And The Inevitability Of Science.Howard Sankey - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (2):259-264.
Foundational Grounding and the Argument From Contingency.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2017 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 8.
Symmetric Contingency Logic with Unlimitedly Many Modalities.Jie Fan - 2019 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 48 (5):851-866.
Approaching the Alethic Modal Hexagon of Opposition.Peter Simons - 2012 - Logica Universalis 6 (1-2):109-118.
On the Canonicity of Sahlqvist Identities.Bjarni Jónsson - 1994 - Studia Logica 53 (4):473 - 491.
Negotiating as Emotion Management.W. Mastenbroek - 1999 - Theory, Culture and Society 16 (4):49-73.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-05-08

Total views
15 ( #612,277 of 2,326,334 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #129,743 of 2,326,334 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes