Educational Philosophy and Theory 47 (12):1304-1318 (2015)

In Australia, the university ethics approval process is guided by the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. The National Statement does not provide a hurdle to be overcome or avoided, nor is it a Godzilla-like monster that must be slain for truth to survive. Rather the National Statement provides an affirmation of an abiding respect for all life and a mechanism for beginning the intelligent questioning, theorization and contextualization for a work of art. Focusing specifically on the emergent discipline of artistic research, this article addresses the question of how the supervisory process may take on the ‘spirit’ of the National Statement to engender genuine ethical debate, rather than merely focus on the instrumental obstacles that seem to get in the way of the research. It specifically addresses the emergent field of artistic research and the concomitant resistance to ethical regulation of artistic research, in which bureaucratic instrumentalism and compliance or censorship are considered to potentially emasculate the vitality of an art work and the ability of art to serve as a truthsayer or agent provocateur. In this, the attitude of the supervisor toward research ethics in artistic research is considered a key factor in determining their students attitudes towards the ethics process. This article will present several initiatives undertaken with the intent of more fully engaging supervisors and students with research ethics.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00131857.2015.1044929
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,496
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Honest Research.Dr Harold Hillman - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):49-58.
Honest Research.Harold Hillman - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):49-58.
Quality Improvement Projects and Research Review.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (4):394-394.


Added to PP index

Total views
10 ( #870,014 of 2,446,314 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #456,608 of 2,446,314 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes