Authors
Peter Zuk
Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School
Abstract
A 2011 National Academies of Sciences report called for an “Information Commons” and a “Knowledge Network” to revolutionize biomedical research and clinical care. We interviewed 41 expert stakeholders to examine governance, access, data collection, and privacy in the context of a medical information commons. Stakeholders' attitudes about MICs align with the NAS vision of an Information Commons; however, differences of opinion regarding clinical use and access warrant further research to explore policy and technological solutions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1073110519840483
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,683
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Locke, Intellectual Property Rights, and the Information Commons.Herman T. Tavani - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (2):87-97.
Tragedies Without Commons.Christopher Knapp - 2011 - Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (1):81-94.
Mandatory Disclosure and Medical Paternalism.Emma Bullock - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (2):409-424.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-04-18

Total views
27 ( #411,599 of 2,462,457 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,311 of 2,462,457 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes