An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning

Artificial Intelligence 93 (1-2):63-101 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Abstract argumentation.Robert A. Kowalski & Francesca Toni - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):275-296.
Default Soundness in the Old Approach: An Epistemic Analysis of Default Reasoning.David Gaytán - 2019 - In Matthieu Fontaine, Cristina Barés-Gómez, Francisco Salguero-Lamillar, Lorenzo Magnani & Ángel Nepomuceno-Fernández (eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology: Inferential Models for Logic, Language, Cognition and Computation. Springer Verlag.
Initial sets in abstract argumentation frameworks.Yuming Xu & Claudette Cayrol - 2018 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 28 (2-3):260-279.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-22

Downloads
21 (#695,936)

6 months
12 (#178,599)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Defeasible Reasoning.John L. Pollock - 1987 - Cognitive Science 11 (4):481-518.
Circumscription — A Form of Non-Monotonic Reasoning.John McCarthy - 1980 - Artificial Intelligence 13 (1-2):27–39.
Semantic Considerations on nonmonotonic Logic.Robert C. Moore - 1985 - Artificial Intelligence 25 (1):75-94.
A logical framework for default reasoning.David Poole - 1988 - Artificial Intelligence 36 (1):27-47.

View all 10 references / Add more references