In Defense of Pure Reason

Cambridge University Press (1998)

A comprehensive defence of the rationalist view that insight independent of experience is a genuine basis for knowledge.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book $77.11 new (35% off)   $79.99 used (32% off)   $94.66 direct from Amazon (20% off)    Amazon page
ISBN(s) 0521592364  
DOI 10.2307/3071165
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,433
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Compassionate Phenomenal Conservatism.Michael Huemer - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):30–55.
What's Wrong with Moore's Argument?James Pryor - 2004 - Philosophical Issues 14 (1):349–378.

View all 131 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Four Theses Concerning a Priori Justification.Laurence BoJjour - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:13-20.
The Fallibility of Rational Insight.Robin Jeshion - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:301-310.
Précis of in Defense of Pure Reason. [REVIEW]Laurence Bonjour - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):625–631.


Added to PP index

Total views
261 ( #22,842 of 2,255,417 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #21,826 of 2,255,417 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature