Ethics and Information Technology 20 (1):41-58 (2018)

This paper pertains to research works aiming at linking ethics and automated reasoning in autonomous machines. It focuses on a formal approach that is intended to be the basis of an artificial agent’s reasoning that could be considered by a human observer as an ethical reasoning. The approach includes some formal tools to describe a situation and models of ethical principles that are designed to automatically compute a judgement on possible decisions that can be made in a given situation and explain why a given decision is ethically acceptable or not. It is illustrated on three ethical frameworks—utilitarian ethics, deontological ethics and the Doctrine of Double effect whose formal models are tested on ethical dilemmas so as to examine how they respond to those dilemmas and to highlight the issues at stake when a formal approach to ethical concepts is considered. The whole approach is instantiated on the drone dilemma, a thought experiment we have designed; this allows the discrepancies that exist between the judgements of the various ethical frameworks to be shown. The final discussion allows us to highlight the different sources of subjectivity of the approach, despite the fact that concepts are expressed in a more rigorous way than in natural language: indeed, the formal approach enables subjectivity to be identified and located more precisely.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10676-018-9444-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,599
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
Consequentialism.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ethics and its Challenges.Johannes Michael Schnarrer - 2006 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 5 (13):4-13.
The ‘Faith’ Factor in the Internet World.T. Gopal - 2004 - International Review of Information Ethics 2.
Ebola, Epidemics, and Ethics - What We Have Learned.G. Kevin Donovan - 2014 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 9:15.


Added to PP index

Total views
29 ( #383,136 of 2,462,228 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #119,417 of 2,462,228 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes