Functional Patent Classification

In Wolfgang Glänzel, Henk F. Moed, Ulrich Schmoch & Mike Thelwall (eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer Verlag. pp. 983-1003 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Patent classifications are systematically used in patent analysis for a number of purposes. Existing classifications not only shape the administrative activities of recording and reporting and the search for prior art, but also create the backbone of the construction of science and technology indicators used in economic analysis, policy making, and business and competitive intelligence.Yet the current classification system of patents, despite significant and continuous efforts to update, suffers from a number of limitations. In particular, it fails to capture the full potential of inventions to cut across industrial boundaries, does not allow fine-grained technology intelligence, and misses almost entirely the opportunities for lateral vision.We suggest integrating existing schemes with a full scale functional classification, i. e., based on the main functions performed by a technology, rather than on the inventive solutions or their potential applications. The functional approach allows us to overcome most of the limits of traditional classification, due to the generality and abstraction of the representation of functions. In this chapter, we will first review the conceptual background of the functional approach in epistemology and analytical philosophy and illustrate its recent developments in engineering design, design theory, artificial intelligence, computational linguistics, and data mining. We then discuss three short case studies of the application of the methodology for the definition of patent sets, prior art analysis, and technology crossover identification and mapping.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Methodological Challenges for Creating Accurate Patent Indicators.Ulrich Schmoch & Mosahid Khan - 2019 - In Wolfgang Glänzel, Henk F. Moed, Ulrich Schmoch & Mike Thelwall (eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer Verlag. pp. 907-927.
Exploiting Images for Patent Search.Ilias Gialampoukidis, Anastasia Moumtzidou, Stefanos Vrochidis & Ioannis Kompatsiaris - 2019 - In Wolfgang Glänzel, Henk F. Moed, Ulrich Schmoch & Mike Thelwall (eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer Verlag. pp. 889-906.
Invisible genomes: The genomics revolution and patenting practice.Adam Bostanci & Jane Calvert - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (1):109-119.
The mathematics of patent claim analysis.Zsófia Kacsuk - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (4):263-289.
The influence of patents on science.Jonathan Trerise - 2016 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 15 (4):424-450.
Patents and ethics: Is it possible to be balanced?Jacek Spławiński - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):71-74.
Automated patent landscaping.Aaron Abood & Dave Feltenberger - 2018 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 26 (2):103-125.
Scientific Realism and the Patent System.David B. Resnik - 2016 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 47 (1):69-77.
Information Technology-Based Patent Retrieval Models.Carson Leung, Wookey Lee & Justin Jongsu Song - 2019 - In Wolfgang Glänzel, Henk F. Moed, Ulrich Schmoch & Mike Thelwall (eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer Verlag. pp. 859-874.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-07

Downloads
6 (#1,383,956)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references