`Good' and `good for': A reply to Hurka

Mind 97 (386):279-280 (1988)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/XCVII.386.279
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,803
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Virtue as Loving the Good.Thomas Hurka - 1992 - Social Philosophy and Policy 9 (2):149.
How Great A Good Is Virtue?Thomas Hurka - 1998 - Journal of Philosophy 95 (4):181 - 203.
The Carpenter and the Good.Rachel Barney - 2008 - In D. Cairns, F. G. Herrmann & T. Penner (eds.), Pursuing the Good: Ethics and Metaphysics in Plato's Republic. University of Edinburgh.
Value Theory.Thomas Hurka - 2006 - In David Copp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Oxford University Press. pp. 357--379.
Conceptual Closure in Anselm's Proof: Reply to Tony Roark.Gyula Klima - 2003 - History and Philosophy of Logic 24 (2):131-134.
`Good' and `Good For'.Thomas Hurka - 1987 - Mind 96 (381):71-73.
Hurka's Theory of Virtue.Stephen Kershnar - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (2):159-168.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
42 ( #128,026 of 2,202,777 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #301,722 of 2,202,777 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature