Kant's explication and Carnap's explication: The Redde rationem

International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (3; ISSU 171):289-298 (2003)

Abstract
In this paper I will compare the concept of explication à la Carnap and the concept of explication à la Kant. This essay should primarily be seen as a comparison of two different philosophical styles, but it is also intended as a vindication of what Kant wrote and what Carnap forgot to read
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  History of Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0019-0365
DOI 10.5840/ipq200343335
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,545
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Experimental Explication.Jonah N. Schupbach - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (3):672-710.
Explication Defended.Patrick Maher - 2007 - Studia Logica 86 (2):331-341.
Fear of Knowledge: Clinical Hypotheses in Diagnostic and Prognostic Reasoning.Daniele Chiffi & Renzo Zanotti - 2017 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 23 (5):928-934.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
76 ( #96,086 of 2,325,369 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #265,227 of 2,325,369 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature