Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (4):368-386 (2014)

Authors
Sigrid Sterckx
University of Ghent
Abstract
Doping scandals can reveal unresolved tensions between the meritocratic values of equal opportunity + reward for effort and the “talentocratic” love of hereditary privilege. Whence this special reverence for talent? We analyze the following arguments: (1) talent is a unique indicator of greater potential, whereas doping enables only temporary boosts (the fluke critique); (2) developing a talent is an authentic endeavor of “becoming who you are,” whereas reforming the fundamentals of your birth suit via artifice is an act of alienation (the phony critique); (3) your (lack of) talent informs you of your proper place and purpose in life, whereas doping frustrates such an amor fati self-understanding (the fateless critique). We conclude that these arguments fail to justify a categorical preference for natural talent over integrated artifice. Instead, they illustrate the extent to which unsavory beliefs about “nature’s aristocracy” may still be at play in the moral theatre of sports
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jmp/jhu024
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,657
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Darwinism and the Cultural Evolution of Sports.Andreas De Block & Siegfried Dewitte - 2008 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 52 (1):1-16.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Doping as a Manifestation of a Narcissistic Civilization.Konstantinos Dedousis - 2021 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 15 (1):88-102.
Doping, Debunking, and Drawing the Line.Eric Gilbertson - 2020 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 15 (2):160-184.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Attributed Talent is a Powerful Myth.Clemens Tesch-Römer - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):427-427.
The Ethics of Talent Management.Stephen Swailes - 2013 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 22 (1):32-46.
Absurd Environmentalism.Douglas K. Detterman, Lynne T. Gabriel & Joanne M. Ruthsatz - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):411-412.
Fruitless Polarities.Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):411-411.
Why Athletic Doping Should Be Banned.Eric Chwang - 2012 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (1):33-49.
Natural Born Talents Undiscovered.Michael J. A. Howe, Jane W. Davidson & John A. Sloboda - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):432-437.
A Study of Poetic Talent.D. Stumberg - 1928 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 11 (3):219.
Harm, Risk, and Doping Analogies: A Counter-Response to Kious.Oskar MacGregor & Mike McNamee - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (3):201-207.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-07-06

Total views
32 ( #345,901 of 2,462,294 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,321 of 2,462,294 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes