In Kimary Shahin, Susan Blake & Eun-Sook Kim (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. CLSI (1999)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
We propose that the restrictive/non restrictive distinction found in relative clauses corresponds to the Inalienable vs Alienable distinction of the Nominal Possessive constructions. We propose to extend this distinction to adjectives suggesting that is not construction specific.
|
Keywords | relative clauses possessive nominals adjective |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Buy the book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Possessive Individualism and Political RealitiesThe Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. C. B. MacPherson.Bertram Morris - 1965 - Ethics 75 (3):207-.
Anaphoric Constraints and Dualities in the Semantics of Nominals.António Branco - 2005 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 14 (2):149-171.
Conceptual and Linguistic Representations of Kinds and Classes.Sandeep Prasada, Laura Hennefield & Daniel Otap - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (7):1224-1250.
A Modal Ambiguity in for-Infinitival Relative Clauses.Martin Hackl & Jon Nissenbaum - 2012 - Natural Language Semantics 20 (1):59-81.
Reasons for Action: Agent-Neutral Vs. Agent-Relative.Michael Ridge - 2011 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2012-12-26
Total views
290 ( #36,674 of 2,505,223 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #51,714 of 2,505,223 )
2012-12-26
Total views
290 ( #36,674 of 2,505,223 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #51,714 of 2,505,223 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads