Synthese 112 (1):53-73 (1997)
A closer examination of scientific practice has cast doubt recently on the thesis that observation necessarily fails to determine theory. In some cases scientists derive fundamental hypotheses from phenomena and general background knowledge by means of demonstrative induction. This note argues that it is wrong to interpret such an argument as providing inductive support for the conclusion, e.g. by eliminating rival hypotheses. The examination of the deduction of the inverse square law of gravitation due to J. Bertrand, and R. Fowler's deduction of the quantization of the linear harmonic oscillator's energy spectrum from Planck's radiation law illustrates this point. It is suggested that demonstrative induction is a computational step in fitting a theoretical model and a set of phenomena, with little direct confirmational impact. The thesis of underdetermination, whatever one may think of it, is not threatened by demonstrative induction.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy Epistemology Logic Metaphysics Philosophy of Language|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Demonstrative Induction and the Skeleton of Inference.P. D. Magnus - 2008 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (3):303-315.
Similar books and articles
How Far Are We From the Quantum Theory of Gravity?Lee Smolin - 2003 - arXiv.
To Quantize or Not to Quantize: Fact and Folklore in Quantum Gravity.Christian Wuthrich - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):777-788.
Quantum Concepts in Space and Time.Roger Penrose & C. J. Isham (eds.) - 1986 - New York ;Oxford University Press.
The Philosophy Behind Quantum Gravity.Henrik Zinkernagel - 2006 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 21 (3):295-312.
Must Evidence Underdetermine Theory.John D. Norton - forthcoming - The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice:17--44.
What Demonstrative Induction Can Do Against the Threat of Underdetermination: Bohr, Heisenberg, and Pauli on Spectroscopic Anomalies (1921–24).Michela Massimi - 2004 - Synthese 140 (3):243-277.
Weinberg on QFT: Demonstrative Induction and Underdetermination.Jonathan Bain - 1998 - Synthese 117 (1):1-30.
The Determination of Theory by Evidence: The Case for Quantum Discontinuity, 1900–1915.John D. Norton - 1993 - Synthese 97 (1):1 - 31.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads44 ( #116,718 of 2,158,886 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #354,157 of 2,158,886 )
How can I increase my downloads?