Political liberalism, free speech and public reason

European Journal of Political Theory 14 (2):180-208 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I critically assess John Rawls' repeated claim that the duty of civility is only a moral duty and should not be enforced by law. In the first part of the paper, I examine and reject the view that Rawls' position may be due to the practical difficulties that the legal enforcement of the duty of civility might entail. I thus claim that Rawls' position must be driven by deeper normative reasons grounded in a conception of free speech. In the second part of the paper, I therefore examine various arguments for free speech and critically assess whether they are consistent with Rawls' political liberalism. I first focus on the arguments from truth and self-fulfilment. Both arguments, I argue, rely on comprehensive doctrines and therefore cannot provide a freestanding political justification for free speech. Freedom of speech, I claim, can be justified instead on the basis of Rawls' political conception of the person and of the two moral powers. However, Rawls' wide view of public reason already allows scope for the kind of free speech necessary for the exercise of the two moral powers and therefore cannot explain Rawls' opposition to the legal enforcement of the duty of civility. Such opposition, I claim, can only be explained on the basis of a defence of unconstrained freedom of speech grounded in the ideas of democracy and political legitimacy. Yet, I conclude, while public reason and the duty of civility are essential to political liberalism, unconstrained freedom of speech is not. Rawls and political liberals could therefore renounce unconstrained freedom of speech, and endorse the legal enforcement of the duty of civility, while remaining faithful to political liberalism

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,533

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant and Rawls on Free Speech in Autocracies.Peter Niesen - 2018 - Kantian Review 23 (4):615-640.
Rawlsian Political Liberalism, Public Reason, and Bioethics.Hon-Lam Li - 2021 - In Hon-Lam Li & Michael Campbell (eds.), Public Reason and Bioethics: Three Perspectives. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 3-57.
Civility as political constraint.William A. Edmundson - 2002 - Res Publica 8 (3):217-229.
John Rawls and the Freedom of Political Speech.Marita Brčić Kuljiš - 2023 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 43 (3):509-528.
Self-respect and public reason.Gregory Whitfield - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (6):677-696.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-06-10

Downloads
97 (#189,552)

6 months
5 (#898,127)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matteo Bonotti
Monash University

Citations of this work

Conspiracy theories and reasonable pluralism.Matej Cíbik & Pavol Hardoš - 2022 - European Journal of Political Theory 21 (3):445-465.
Conspiracy theories and reasonable pluralism.Matej Cíbik & Pavol Hardoš - 2022 - European Journal of Political Theory 21 (3):445-465.
Kant and Rawls on Free Speech in Autocracies.Peter Niesen - 2018 - Kantian Review 23 (4):615-640.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references