Heythrop Journal (4):648-659 (2018)

Mark J. Boone
Hong Kong Baptist University
Augustine and William James both argue that religious faith can be both practical and rational even in the absence of knowledge. Augustine argues that religious faith is trust and that trust is a normal, proper, and even necessary way of believing. Beginning with faith, we then work towards knowledge by means of philosophical contemplation. James’ “The Will to Believe” makes pragmatic arguments for the rationality of faith. Although we do not know (yet) whether God exists, faith is a choice between the risk of believing something false and the risk of not believing something true, and in the absence of convincing evidence we may decide for ourselves which risk we prefer. We may be able to experience God in the future and thereby gain knowledge, yet this may be contingent on our willingness to believe. There are key differences, however. Augustine is a Christian with a neo-Platonic bent, James an empiricist defending the religion of your choice. These differences may be less significant than they first appear. After explaining Augustine and then James I draw out the major points of comparison and contrast and suggest a few reasons their insights might be at least partially synthesized. This is the accepted version of the following article: Mark J. Boone, “Augustine and William James on the Rationality of Faith,” The Heythrop Journal (online edition December 2018), which has been published in final form at [See First URL]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with the Wiley Self-Archiving Policy [See Second URL].
Keywords William James  Augustine  C. S. Lewis  religious epistemology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2020
DOI 10.1111/heyj.13123
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

William James' Viewpoint on Emotional Feelings and Rationality of Religious Beliefs.Mohammad Hadi Shahab - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 10 (38):41-58.
Faith Seeking a Reasonable Understanding.David Alan Nakamaye - 1996 - Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
The Epistemology of Faith in Augustine and Aquinas.Paul A. Macdonald Jr - 2010 - In Phillip Cary, John Doody & Kim Paffenroth (eds.), Augustine and Philosophy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. pp. 167-196.
William James on Ethics and Faith.Michael R. Slater - 2009 - Cambridge University Press.
William James on Ethics and Faith by Michael R. Slater (Review).Jacob L. Goodson - 2013 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 34 (3):285-288.
William James on Ethics and Faith.Michael R. Slater - 2009 - Cambridge University Press.
Rethinking on Faith Doctrine as William James’s “The Will to Believe.Mas”oud Āzarbayjāni - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 10 (37):5-26.
James's Will-to-Believe Doctrine.James C. S. Wernham - 1987 - Mcgill-Queen's University Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
105 ( #91,546 of 2,385,839 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #21,561 of 2,385,839 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes