All things considered duties to believe

Synthese 187 (2):509-517 (2012)
Abstract
To be a doxastic deontologist is to claim that there is such a thing as an ethics of belief (or of our doxastic attitudes in general). In other words, that we are subject to certain duties with respect to our doxastic attitudes, the non-compliance with which makes us blameworthy and that we should understand doxastic justification in terms of these duties. In this paper, I argue that these duties are our all things considered duties, and not our epistemic or moral duties, for example. I show how this has the surprising result that, if deontologism is a thesis about doxastic justification, it entails that there is no such thing as epistemic or moral justification for a belief that p. I then suggest why this result, though controversial, may have some salutary consequences: primarily that it helps us make some sense of an otherwise puzzling situation regarding doxastic dilemmas.
Keywords Epistemology  Ethics of belief  All things considered duties
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-010-9857-5
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,827
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Evidentialism.Earl Conee & Richard Feldman - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Epistemic Justification.William Alston - 1989 - Cornell University Press.
A New Argument for Evidentialism.Nishi Shah - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):481–498.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
No Exception for Belief.Susanna Rinard - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (1):121-143.
Epistemic Benefits of Elaborated and Systematized Delusions in Schizophrenia.Lisa Bortolotti - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (3):879-900.
Ampliative Transmission and Deontological Internalism.Luis R. G. Oliveira - forthcoming - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly:n/a-n/a.
Epistemic Ought is a Commensurable Ought.Anthony Robert Booth - 2014 - European Journal of Philosophy 22 (4):529-539.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
On the Relationship Between Propositional and Doxastic Justification.John Turri - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (2):312-326.
Diamonds in the Cosmic Sands.Ronald Dworkin - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 54 (54):22-31.
Epistemic Duties and Failure to Understand One's Evidence.Scott Stapleford - 2012 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 16 (1):147-177.
Deontology in Ethics and Epistemology.Anthony Robert Booth - 2008 - Metaphilosophy 39 (4-5):530-545.
Kant's Ethics and Duties to Oneself.Lara Denis - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (4):321–348.
On the Duties of Shared Parenting.Philip Cook - 2012 - Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):168-181.
Libertarianism.Peter Vallentyne - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Basic Positive Duties of Justice and Narveson's Libertarian Challenge.Pablo Gilabert - 2006 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (2):193-216.
Added to PP index
2011-01-19

Total downloads
229 ( #18,171 of 2,210,106 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #36,242 of 2,210,106 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature