Environmental Ethics 15 (1):75-84 (1993)
Contemporary defenders of philosophical vegetarianism are too often unaware of their historical predecessors. In this paper, I contribute to the rectification of this neglect by focusing on the case of Rousseau. In part one, I identify and articulate an argument against meat eating that is implicitly present in Rousseau’s writings, although it is never explicitly developed. In part two, I consider and respond to two objections that might be made to the claim that this argument should be attributed to Rousseau. In part three, I consider how Rousseau’s argument might fit into a general typology of recent discussions of vegetarianism, and argue that the eclectic nature that is revealed in doing so shows that the argument is worthy of further consideration
|Keywords||Applied Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Moderation, Morals, and Meat.Frederick Ferré - 1986 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 29 (1-4):391-406.
Kant and Rousseau on the Critique of Philosophical Theology: The Primacy of Practical Reason.Philip A. Quadrio - 2009 - Sophia 48 (2):179-193.
The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory.Carol J. Adams - 2000 - Continuum.
Vegetarianism, Traditional Morality, and Moral Conservatism.David Detmer - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):39-48.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #116,151 of 2,171,972 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #117,902 of 2,171,972 )
How can I increase my downloads?