Whence the Contradiction?


Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords logicism   basic law v   indefinite extensibility   hume’s principle
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,901
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Speaking with Shadows: A Study of Neo‐Logicism.Fraser MacBride - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (1):103-163.
Quantifiers and Quantification.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2014 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Varieties of Indefinite Extensibility.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2015 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 56 (1):147-166.
Hume = Small Hume.Jeffrey Ketland - 2002 - Analysis 62 (1):92–93.
The Law of Non-Contradiction as a Metaphysical Principle.Tuomas Tahko - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Logic 7:32-47.
Is Hume's Principle Analytic?Crispin Wright - 2001 - In Bob Hale & Crispin Wright (eds.), Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. Oxford University Press. pp. 307-333.
Łukasiewicz on the Principle of Contradiction.Venanzio Raspa - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Research 24:57-112.
The Logic in Logicism.Alexander Bird - 1997 - Dialogue 36 (2):341--60.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-03-20

Total views
7 ( #1,023,706 of 2,439,096 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #434,440 of 2,439,096 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes