Westphal's Transposition in Aeschylus, Supplices 86–95

Classical Quarterly 24 (2):207-210 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Westphal wished to transpose lines 88–90 and 93–5 of the Supplices. This transposition has been supported recently by R. D. Dawe, by Holger Friis Johansen in C. & M. xxvii, 43–4, and by Sir Denys Page. However, the transposition gains little support from a careful examination of the language and context of the passage, as I shall now proceed to demonstrate. I discussed the whole passage previously in my article ‘Aeschylus Supplices 86–95’, Classical Philology, 1, 21–5, and much of my argument can be found in that earlier article.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aeschylus' Supplices. [REVIEW]A. F. Garvie - 1973 - The Classical Review 23 (1):21-22.
The Supplices of Aeschylus. [REVIEW]E. W. Whittle - 1970 - The Classical Review 20 (3):296-299.
Aeschylus' Supplices. [REVIEW]James Diggle - 1982 - The Classical Review 32 (2):127-134.
The End of the Supplices Trilogy of Aeschylus.D. S. Robertson - 1924 - The Classical Review 38 (3-4):51-53.
The date of the Supplices of Aeschylus.E. C. Yorke - 1954 - The Classical Review 4 (01):10-11.
Aeschylus, Supplices, 1012–3.C. W. Brodribb - 1922 - The Classical Review 36 (7-8):162-.
Tucker's Supplices of Aeschylus. [REVIEW]A. E. Housman - 1890 - The Classical Review 4 (3):105-109.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
9 (#1,219,856)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references