Artifact and Artifact Categorization: Comparing Humans and Capuchin Monkeys

Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (3):375-389 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We aim to show that far-related primates like humans and the capuchin monkeys show interesting correspondences in terms of artifact characterization and categorization. We investigate this issue by using a philosophically-inspired definition of physical artifact which, developed for human artifacts, turns out to be applicable for cross-species comparison. In this approach an artifact is created when an entity is intentionally selected and some capacities attributed to it (often characterizing a purpose). Behavioral studies suggest that this notion of artifact is not specific to the human kind. On the basis of the results of a series of field observations and experiments on wild capuchin monkeys that routinely use stone hammers and anvils, we show that the notions of intentional selection and attributed capacity appear to be at play in capuchins as well. The study also suggests that functional criteria and contextualization play a fundamental role in terms of artifact recognition and categorization in nonhuman primates

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,140

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Artifact Categorization and the Modal Theory of Artifact Function.Bence Nanay - 2013 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (3):515-526.
Artifact and Tool Categorization.Sara Dellantonio, Claudio Mulatti & Remo Job - 2013 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (3):407-418.
Computer systems: Moral entities but not moral agents. [REVIEW]Deborah G. Johnson - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):195-204.
The nature of artifacts.Steven Vogel - 2003 - Environmental Ethics 25 (2):149-168.
Seedless grapes: Nature and culture.Dan Sperber - 2007 - In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence (eds.), Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representaion. Oxford University Press. pp. 124--137.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-14

Downloads
49 (#240,943)

6 months
3 (#224,280)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The question of animal technical capacities.Ana Cuevas Badallo - 2019 - Humanities Journal of Valparaiso 14:139-170.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Functional analysis.Robert Cummins - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (November):741-64.
Primate Cognition.Michael Tomasello & Josep Call - 1997 - Oxford University Press USA.
Primate Cognition.Amanda Seed & Michael Tomasello - 2010 - Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (3):407-419.
Artifacts, Art Works, and Agency.Randall R. Dipert - 1993 - Temple University Press.
The ontology of artifacts.Lynne Rudder Baker - 2004 - Philosophical Explorations 7 (2):99 – 111.

View all 14 references / Add more references