Beneficence and Decision Making in the Treatment of Meningomyelocele

Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University (1986)

Authors
Jon K. Borowicz
Milwaukee School of Engineering
Abstract
Medical techniques now make it possible to keep alive many victims of meningomyelocele who formerly would have died. A number of physicians and others have said that it is permissible to withhold treatment when the infant, if kept alive, would suffer serious physical or mental impairment. They contend that for some infants it will be better to die than to survive severely impaired, and that this policy is permissible because it is beneficent, i.e., directed by the intention to bring about the patient's good. ;While initially plausible, this attempted justification of the policy raises philosophical problems that have not been treated adequately in the literature, and whose consideration reduces its plausibility. ;First, the permissibility of withholding life-preserving treatment from normal adults requires obtaining their informed consent. Because the defective infant is incapable of decision, and possesses no interests, the concept of proxy consent will not support the decision that his interests would be served by his death. Appealing to the infant's interests cannot succeed in rendering permissible any decision concerning treatment. ;Second, under the ordinary conception of beneficence, one cannot act beneficently toward another by bringing about his nonexistence. One who no longer exists is in no state at all, not in a state better than one of continued existence. The nonworthwhileness, negative value, and poorer quality of life presuppose that the life so judged be compared with another existing life. ;Third, a conception of beneficence more nearly adequate to the purpose of those who would withhold treatment can be derived from Thomas Nagel's notion of relational value, according to which good is indentified in terms of history and possibilities. While this notion permits us to explain the good and ill ascribed to the deaths of adults, it poses special problems for the evaluation of the lives of infants. ;I conclude that in the case of the birth defect, meningomyelocele, the policy of permitting the withholding of treatment cannot be shown to be beneficent on the ground that it leads to the good of the infants from whom treatment is withheld
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,132
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Prolonging Life and Allowing Death: Infants.A. G. Campbell & H. E. McHaffie - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (6):339-344.
Non-Treatment of Spina Bifida Babies.Douglas N. Walton & Deborah C. Hobbs - 1985 - Philosophy Research Archives 11:463-480.
Parenting and the Best Interests of Minors.R. S. Downie & F. Randall - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (3):219-231.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-06

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes