Derrida’s Paralogism of Writing: A Critique of Deconstructive Reasoning

The European Legacy 20 (7):699-714 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is a critique of the flawed logic Derrida employed in articulating his program of a Grammatology for “deconstructing” Western philosophy. I argue that Derrida in several instances built his arguments around what Kant called the “paralogism.” I look at an often cited case in order to substantiate my claim: Derrida’s reading of Saussure, where his argument is based on a paralogism. Derrida misinterprets Saussure by seeing his alleged rejection of graphical writing as a rejection of his own idiosyncratic notion of “writing”, which only corresponds to Saussure’s own notion of “linguistic value,” produced in a system of differences without positive terms

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Derrida and the writing of the body.Jones Irwin - 2010 - Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Does Hegel Privilege Speech Over Writing? A Critique of Jacques Derrida.Tanja Stähler - 2003 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (2):191-204.
Decision, hegemony and law: Derrida and Laclau.E. E. Berns - 1996 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (4):71-80.
Derrida's empirical realism.Timothy Mooney - 1999 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (5):33-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
57 (#287,471)

6 months
16 (#171,756)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Bornedal
American University of Beirut

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references