Epicurus On Pleasure

Phronesis 46 (4):440-465 (2001)
Abstract
The paper deals with the question of the attribution to Epicurus of the classification of pleasures into 'kinetic' and 'static'. This classification, usually regarded as authentic, confronts us with a number of problems and contradictions. Besides, it is only mentioned in a few sources that are not the most reliable. Following Gosling and Taylor, I believe that the authenticity of the classification may be called in question. The analysis of the ancient evidence concerning Epicurus' concept of pleasure is made according to the following principle: first, I consider the sources that do not mention the distinction between 'kinetic' and 'static' pleasures, and only then do I compare them with the other group of texts which comprises reports by Cicero, Diogenes Laertius and Athenaeus. From the former group of texts there emerges a concept of pleasure as a single and not twofold notion, while such terms as 'motion' and 'state' describe not two different phenomena but only two characteristics of the same phenomenon. On the other hand, the reports comprising the latter group appear to derive from one and the same doxographical tradition, and to be connected with the classification of ethical docrines put forward by the Middle Academy and known as the divisio Carneadea. In conclusion, I argue that the idea of Epicurus' classification of pleasures is based on a misinterpretation of Epicurus' concept in Academic doxography, which tended to contrapose it to doctrines of other schools, above all to the Cyrenaics' views
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/156852801753736490
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,010
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Reconciling Justice and Pleasure in Epicurean Contractarianism.John Thrasher - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):423-436.
The Measure of Pleasure: A Note on the Protagoras.Richard Davies - 2017 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3 (3):301-315.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
163 ( #35,528 of 2,275,228 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #88,064 of 2,275,228 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature