Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):73-86 (2010)

Technology assessment (TA) is an important instrument for the regulation of innovation. From the perspective of sociology of knowledge, the regulatory process can be understood as a complex interplay between different forms of knowledge. The prevailing instruments of TA, expertise and participation, are both facing difficulties in dealing with the limits and impasses of regulatory knowledge in the realm of innovation. Nevertheless, as is argued in this article, reflexive forms of TA offer a good, if not the only, answer to the question of how we can deal with the contradictions and paradoxes involved in the regulation of innovation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10202-010-0073-7
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,959
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

文化•创新文化•自主创新.Shankan He - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 22:143-157.
Managing to Innovate in Higher Education.Harold Silver - 1999 - British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (2):145 - 156.
The Influence of Social and Ethical Issues on Innovation: An Exploration of the Innovation “Black Box” Processes.Anne Barraquier - 2011 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:176-188.


Added to PP index

Total views
22 ( #512,690 of 2,504,815 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #103,250 of 2,504,815 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes