Not for Their Own Sake

Review of Metaphysics 52 (4):867-896 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

SPECIES INITIALLY APPEAR TO US AS OMNIPRESENT, familiar, even as rather simple objects of our experience. On closer inspection, however, the appearance of intelligibility is supplanted by mystery. Although scientists now possess a commanding grasp of the general structure and function of biological species, there is as yet no consensus on the philosophical question of exactly what kind of entity species are. Are they class entities, as a traditional view has it? Or are species actual, substantial beings? If they are among the latter, what, if anything, is the ontological difference between species and those paradigms of substantial being, organisms? Is it true, as many now suppose, that both organisms and species belong in the category of individuality? These questions and the more general problems they imply remain unresolved by scientists and philosophers alike. Perhaps the single matter on which all agree is that species have a long history of frustrating our attempts to account for them.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The utilitarian fallacy.Richard Taylor - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (4):531-541.
For the Sake of a Stone? Inanimate Things and the Demands of Morality.Simon P. James - 2011 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 54 (4):384-397.
The Irony of Chance: On Aristotle’s Physics B, 4-6.Pascal Massie - 2003 - International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (1):15-28.
Nature Connoisseurship.Allan Greenbaum - 2005 - Environmental Values 14 (3):389 - 407.
Confucius and Aristotle on friendship: A comparative study. [REVIEW]Yuanguo He - 2007 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (2):291-307.
Curiosity and the Value of Truth.Michael S. Brady - 2009 - In Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Epistemic Value. Oxford University Press. pp. 265-284.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
20 (#723,940)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references