Research Ethics 13 (2):84-91 (2017)
AbstractPrivacy by Design, a globally accepted framework for personal data management and privacy protection, advances the view that privacy cannot be assured solely by compliance with regulatory frameworks but must become an organisation’s default mode of operation. We are proposing a similar template for the research ethics review process. The Research Ethics by Design framework involves research ethics committees engaging researchers during the design phase of the proposal so that ethical considerations may be directly embedded in the science as opposed to being viewed as addendums after the fact. This collaborative research design proposal results in the establishment of a culture of ethical research rather than research with ethical oversight. Both researchers and research ethics committees come to view the review process as one in which individual protection and collective benefit co-exist in a doubly-enabling positive-sum manner.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
An Introductory Philosophy of Medicine: Humanizing Modern Medicine.James A. Marcum - 2008 - Springer.
Heidegger, Gestell and Rehabilitation of the Biomedical Model.Donald S. Borrett - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (3):497-500.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Investigating Ethical Issues in Engineering Design.Ibo Poel - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):429-446.
Investigating Ethical Issues in Engineering Design.Ibo van de Poel - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):429-446.
Why Research-Oriented Design Isn’T Design-Oriented Research: On the Tensions Between Design and Research in an Implicit Design Discipline.Daniel Fallman - 2007 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 20 (3):193-200.
The Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials: A Short Report.Charles Weijer, Monica Taljaard, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Sarah Jl Edwards & Martin P. Eccles - 2014 - Research Ethics 10 (2):77-85.
Playful Collaborative Exploration: New Research Practice in Participatory Design.Martin Johansson & Per Linde - 2005 - Journal of Research Practice 1 (1):Article M5.
Statistics and Ethics in Medical Research.David L. DeMets - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (1):97-117.
Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees.Leslie Gelling & Carol Munn-Giddings - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (3):100-106.
Research, Knowledge and Design.Greg Bamford - 2003 - In Clare Newton, Sandra Kaj-O'Grady & Simon Wollan (eds.), Design + Research: Project Based Research in Architecture. Second International Conference of the Association of Australasian Schools of Architecture, Melbourne 28 – 30 September, 2003. Association of Architecture Schools of Australasia.
A Survey of Student Opinions on Ethical Design Standards in Taiwan.Yingying Lee, Manlai You & Ming-Ying Yang - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (2):505-530.
Shifting From Research Governance to Research Ethics: A Novel Paradigm for Ethical Review in Community-Based Research.Jay Marlowe & Martin Tolich - 2015 - Research Ethics 11 (4):178-191.
Ethical Review of Undergraduate Student Research in the NHS: Evolution of the System Could Benefit Us All.M. Wilkinson - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):e19-e19.
Rethinking Technology, Revitalizing Ethics: Overcoming Barriers to Ethical Design.Patrick Feng - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (2):207-220.
Tao of Communication Design Practice : Manifesting Implicit Values Through Human-Centred Design.Y. Akama - unknown
Community Members' Engagement with and Involvement in Genomic Research: Lessons to Learn From the Field.Morenike O. Folayan, Kolawole S. Oyedeji & Olawunmi A. Fatusi - 2015 - Developing World Bioethics 15 (1):1-7.
Co-Design and Implementation Research: Challenges and Solutions for Ethics Committees.Felicity Goodyear-Smith, Claire Jackson & Trisha Greenhalgh - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):1-5.