Journal of Pragmatics 39 (10):1689-1701 (2007)

Steffen Borge
Nord University
This paper deals with two distinct topics; unwarranted questions and admittures. The traditional speech act analysis of questions needs revision, since among the felicity conditions of asking a question is believing that the question is warranted. Some questions are unwarranted according to my analysis. A question is unwarranted if the questioner is not standing in the right relation to the addressee, such that he can demand or expect a sincere answer. I use the idea of unwarranted questions to show how conversational admittures can be generated. A conversational admitture is a non-intended admittance by the speaker of some state of affairs being believed by the speaker to be true. Under the assumption that the speaker is rational, the non-intended admittance is something that it is reasonable to credit the speaker with believing as an explanation of the speaker's unwillingness to be cooperative in a given conversation. In the last section I introduce what I call the Principle of Privacy, which tells us that we have a prima facie right to guard some of our thoughts, feelings, personal history, etc. I argue that the Principle of Privacy together with the ideas that there are unwarranted questions and conversational admittures, and the way unwarranted questions can be exploited to generate the latter, endows us with the right to lie in certain contexts. ; ;
Keywords Questions  Speech act analysis  Unwarranted questions  Admitture  Implicature  Conversation  The Principle of Privacy  The right to lie
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Hermeneutic Priority of Which Question?Nathan Dickman - 2021 - Informal Logic 41 (3):485-508.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Communication, Cooperation and Conflict.Steffen Borge - 2012 - ProtoSociology 29:223-241.
Implicating Questions.David Braun - 2011 - Mind and Language 26 (5):574-595.
On Negative Yes/No Questions.Maribel Romero & Chung-Hye Han - 2004 - Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (5):609-658.
An Approach to Why-Questions.Antti Koura - 1988 - Synthese 74 (2):191 - 206.
On the Representation of Context.Robert Stalnaker - 1998 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (1):3-19.
Quantity, Volubility, and Some Varieties of Discourse.Mitchell S. Green - 1995 - Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (1):83 - 112.
The Art of Asking Questions.Leah M. McClimans - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (4):521 - 538.


Added to PP index

Total views
77 ( #151,976 of 2,519,860 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,519,860 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes