Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 39 (1):109-119 (2008)
In the mid-1990s, the company Human Genome Sciences submitted three potentially revolutionary patent applications to the US Patent and Trademark Office, each of which claimed the entire genome sequence of a microorganism. The patent examiners, however, objected to these applications, and after negotiation they were eventually re-written to resemble more traditional gene patents. In this paper, which is based on a study of the patent examination files, we examine the reasons why these patent applications were unsuccessful in their original form. We show that with respect to utility and novelty, the patent attorney’s case built on an understanding of the genome as a computer-related invention. The patent examiners did not object to the patenting of complete genome sequences as computer-related inventions on moral grounds or in terms of the distinction between a discovery and an invention. Instead, their objections were based on classification, rules and procedure. Rather than patent examiners having a notion of a genome that should not be patented, the notion of a ‘genome’, and the ways in which it may be different from a ‘gene’, played no role in these debates. We discuss the consequences of our findings for patenting in the biosciences
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Genetic Information: A Metaphor in Search of a Theory.Paul E. Griffiths - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 68 (3):394-412.
On the Theoretical Role of "Genetic Coding".Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (1):26-44.
If the Genome Isn't a God-Like Ghost in the Machine, Then What is It?M. Blute - 2004 - Biology and Philosophy 20 (2-3):401-407.
Citations of this work BETA
Science Inside Law: The Making of a New Patent Class in the International Patent Classification.Hyo Yoon Kang - 2012 - Science in Context 25 (4):551-594.
Similar books and articles
Genomic Databases as Global Public Goods?Ruth Chadwick & Sarah Wilson - 2004 - Res Publica 10 (2):123-134.
The Invisible Century: Einstein, Freud, and the Search for Hidden Universes.Richard Panek - 2004 - Fourth Estate.
It's About Scientific Secrecy, Dummy: A Better Equilibrium Among Genomics Patenting, Scientific Research and Health Care. [REVIEW]Miriam Bentwich - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):263-284.
Peter W. B. Phillips and Chika B. Onwuekwe (Eds): Accessing and Sharing the Benefits of the Genomics Revolution. [REVIEW]Clem Tisdell - 2009 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (4):379-382.
Reconstructing the Concept of Homology for Genomics.Catherine Kendig - 2001 - Pittsburgh/London Colloquium on Philosophy of Biology and Neuroscience, University of London. Online at PhilSci Archive.
On Decoding and Rewriting Genomes: A Psychoanalytical Reading of a Scientific Revolution. [REVIEW]Hub Zwart - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (3):337-346.
Exploiting Abstract Possibilities: A Critique of the Concept and Practice of Product Patenting. [REVIEW]Hans Radder - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (3):275-291.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #181,861 of 2,163,896 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #62,637 of 2,163,896 )
How can I increase my downloads?