The state of the art as regards the thesis of indeterminacy of translation is as follows. Very much has been said about it, most of which is based on misunderstandings. No satisfactory formulation of the thesis has been presented. No good argument has been given in favour of the thesis. No good argument has been advanced against it
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Synonymy and the Epistemology of Linguistics.Jay F. Rosenberg - 1967 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):405-420.
The Bifurcation of Scientific Theories and Indeterminacy of Translation.Donald Hockney - 1975 - Philosophy of Science 42 (4):411-427.
The Esoteric Quine? Belief Attribution and the Significance of the Indeterminacy Thesis in Quine’s Kant Lectures.H. G. Callaway - 2003 - In W.V. Quine, Wissenschaft und Empfindung. Frommann-Holzboog.
Intension and Representation: Quine's Indeterminacy Thesis Revisited.Itay Shani - 2005 - Philosophical Psychology 18 (4):415 – 440.
Indeterminacy and Interpretation.Günter Abel - 1994 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (4):403 – 419.
On How to Avoid the Indeterminacy of Translation.Panu Raatikainen - 2005 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):395-413.
Are Quine’s Two Indeterminacy Theses Compatible?Gábor Forrai - 1999 - Acta Analytica 14 (23.):89-99..
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #116,079 of 2,171,743 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #173,816 of 2,171,743 )
How can I increase my downloads?