Can a Right to Reproduce Justify the Status Quo on Parental Licensing?


Authors
Carolyn McLeod
University of Western Ontario
Andrew Botterell
Western University
Abstract
The status quo on parental licensing in most Western jurisdictions is that licensing is required in the case of adoption but not in the case of assisted or unassisted biological reproduction. To have a child via adoption, one must fulfill licensing requirements, which, beyond the usual home study, can include mandatory participation in parenting classes. One is exempt from these requirements, however, if one has a child via biological reproduction, including assisted reproduction involving donor gametes or a contract pregnancy. In an earlier paper, we challenged this system of parental licensing by showing that arguments in favour of it do not succeed. One argument we failed to consider, however, is that prospective biological parents have a right to reproduce that protects them against the sort of state interference that is involved in parental licensing. According to this argument, because prospective adoptive parents do not exercise a similar right when attempting to become parents, they are not similarly protected. In this paper, we argue that this reproductive rights argument, like other arguments in favour of the status quo on parental licensing, is flawed. We also question whether people in fact have a right to reproduce, and in doing so distinguish this right from others that we think are legitimate, including a right to become a parent and a right to bodily autonomy.
Keywords parental licensing  adoption  reproduction
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Preferences, Welfare, and the Status-Quo Bias.Dale Dorsey - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):535-554.
A Right to Reproduce?Muireann Quigley - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (8):403-411.
Toward Drug Control: Exclusion and Buyer Licensing. [REVIEW]Jim Leitzel - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):99-119.
Parental Rights and Due Process.Donald C. Hubin - 1999 - The Journal of Law and Family Studies 1 (2):123-150.
Challenging the Status Quo.Dominic Wilkinson - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (2):235-237.
Approaching Homelessness: An Integral Re-Frame.Marilyn Hamilton - 2007 - World Futures 63 (2):107 – 126.
Licensing Parents.Hugh LaFollette - 1980 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 9 (2):182-197.
A Critique in Need of Critique.M. Peterson, A. Hollis & T. Pogge - 2010 - Public Health Ethics 3 (2):178-185.
Licensing Parents Revisited.Hugh Lafollette - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (4):327-343.
Does the Concept of “Clade Selection” Make Sense?Samir Okasha - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (4):739-751.
Alienation and the Status Quo.Joseph C. Flay - 1969 - Man and World 2 (2):248-262.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-08-28

Total views
432 ( #11,304 of 2,265,045 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
64 ( #10,818 of 2,265,045 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature