Physicalism, supervenience, and dependence: A reply to Campbell

Dialogue 41 (1):155-161 (2002)
Authors
Andrew Botterell
Western University
Abstract
Neil Campbell has argued that certain problems with the doctrine of psycho-physical supervenience can be overcome if supervenience is viewed as a relation between predicates rather than as a relation between properties. Campbell suggests that, when properly understood, this predicate version of supervenience "expresses a form of psycho-physical dependence that might be useful to those who wish to argue for a supervenience-based physicalism”. In this note I indicate why I think we ought to resist this suggestion. First, I argue quite generally that any appeal to a distinction between predicates and properties is irrelevant to issues concerning physicalism and supervenience. And, second, I argue that Campbell's own predicate version of supervenience fails to capture a notion of dependence that physicalists are likely to find useful. I conclude that viewing supervenience as a relation between predicates does not help in articulating a more plausible version of physicalism.
Keywords Dependence  Metaphysics  Physicalism  Supervenience  Campbell, N
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0012-2173
DOI 10.1017/S0012217300013640
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 37,988
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Concepts of Supervenience.Jaegwon Kim - 1984 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (December):153-76.
Psychologism and Behaviorism.Ned Block - 1981 - Philosophical Review 90 (1):5-43.
Replies to Essays X-XI.Donald Davidson - 1985 - In Bruce Vermazen & Merrill B. Hintikka (eds.), Essays on Davidson: Actions and Events. Oxford University Press. pp. 242--252.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Strict Implication, Supervenience, and Physicalism.Robert Kirk - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (2):244-57.
An Argument for Strong Supervenience.Barry M. Loewer - 1995 - In Elias E. Savellos & U. Yalcin (eds.), Supervenience: New Essays. Cambridge University Press. pp. 218--225.
In Defense of Global Supervenience.R. Cranston Paull & Theodore R. Sider - 1992 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (4):833-53.
Supervenience and Physicalism.Andrew R. Bailey - 1998 - Synthese 117 (1):53-73.
Physicalism, Supervenience, and Dependence.P. Trout Moser - 1996 - In Elias E. Savellos & U. Yalcin (eds.), Supervenience: New Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Physicalism, Supervenience, and Dependence.Paul K. Moser & J. D. Trout - 1995 - In Elias E. Savellos (ed.), Supervenience: New Essays. Needham Heights: Cambridge. pp. 187--217.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
19 ( #340,345 of 2,312,294 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #458,434 of 2,312,294 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature