Logic and Logical Philosophy 27 (1):105-141 (2018)

Authors
David Botting
De La Salle University (PhD)
Abstract
In this paper I will argue that most objections to deductive analyses of a priori analogies are incorrect, often involve basic misinterpretations of what the deductive reconstruction of those arguments are saying, and sometimes also betray a confusion about what part of the reasoning corresponds to the analogical inference. In particular, I will be focusing on a raft of objections made by Juthe in [2015] and subject his alternative views to criticism. I will then argue that Juthe does implicitly have a good argument against deductivism: adding further analogues seems to have a cumulative force that they would not have on a deductivist analysis. This is so not only in ordinary analogical arguments but, perhaps surprisingly, with a priori analogical arguments. I will then argue that this does not favor a sui generis view of the analogical argument over inductivist views, and attempt to show that a confirmation-theoretic approach to analogical inference makes the best sense of our intuitions about the strength of analogical arguments.
Keywords arguments by analogy  a priori analogy  deductivism  complex analogies  inferential strength
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.12775/LLP.2017.011
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,688
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Problem of the Criterion.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1973 - Milwaukee, Marquette University Press.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

­A Defense of Analogy Inference as Sui Generis.André Lars Joen Juthe - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:1.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Asymmetrical Analogical Arguments.J. E. Adler - 2007 - Argumentation 21 (1):83-92.
By Parallel Reasoning.Paul Bartha - 2009 - Oxford University Press USA.
Disagreements Over Analogies.Oliver Laas - 2017 - Metaphilosophy 48 (1-2):153-182.
Argument by Analogy.André Juthe - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (1):1-27.
Analogy.Todd Davies - 1985 - In CSLI Informal Notes Series. Stanford, CA, USA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, No. IN-CSLI-85-4,.
Analogies and Other Minds.Bryan Benham - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (2):198-214.
Analogie und mathematisches Denken†.Eberhard Knobloch - 1989 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 12 (1):35-47.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-06-12

Total views
9 ( #864,953 of 2,349,661 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #510,898 of 2,349,661 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes