Argumentation 30 (2):167-180 (2016)

Authors
David Botting
De La Salle University (PhD)
Abstract
In this paper I will defend the controversial thesis that all argumentation in natural language can be reconstructed, for the purposes of assessment, as a deductively valid argument. Evaluation of the argumentation amounts to evaluation of the logical coherence of the premises. I will be taking the pragma-linguistic theory of Bermejo-Luque as an initial starting point.
Keywords Argument evaluation  Deductivism  Pragma-linguistics  Bermejo-Luque
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10503-015-9383-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,688
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Cambridge University Press.
The Virtuous Tortoise.David Botting - 2017 - Philosophical Investigations 40 (1):31-39.
The Virtuous Tortoise.David Botting - 2016 - Philosophical Investigations 39 (4).

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

What is Wrong with Deductivism?Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2020 - Informal Logic 40 (3):295-316.
­A Defense of Analogy Inference as Sui Generis.André Lars Joen Juthe - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:1.
Johnson and the Soundness Doctrine.David Botting - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (4):501-525.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Logical Dimension of Argumentation and Its Semantic Appraisal in Bermejo-Luque’s Giving Reasons.James B. Freeman - 2011 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 26 (3):289-299.
Deductivism Within Pragma-Dialectics.Leo Groarke - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (1):1-16.
Deductivism as an Interpretative Strategy: A Reply to Groarke's Defense of Reconstructive Deductivism.David Godden - 2005 - Argumentation and Advocacy: Journal of the American Forensic Association 41:168-183.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-10-06

Total views
39 ( #249,347 of 2,349,664 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #510,898 of 2,349,664 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes