Functionalism and structuralism as philosophical stances: van Fraassen meets the philosophy of biology

Biology and Philosophy 30 (3):383-403 (2015)

Authors
Sandy Boucher
University of Melbourne
Abstract
I consider the broad perspectives in biology known as ‘functionalism’ and ‘structuralism’, as well as a modern version of functionalism, ‘adaptationism’. I do not take a position on which of these perspectives is preferable; my concern is with the prior question, how should they be understood? Adapting van Fraassen’s argument for treating materialism as a stance, rather than a factual belief with propositional content, in the first part of the paper I offer an argument for construing functionalism and structuralism as stances also. The argument draws especially on Gould’s insights concerning functionalism and structuralism, in particular their apparent historical continuity from the pre-Darwinian period through to today. In the second part of the paper I consider Godfrey-Smith’s distinction between empirical and explanatory adaptationism, and suggest that while the former is an empirical scientific hypothesis, the latter is closely related to the functionalist stance
Keywords Functionalism  Structuralism  Adaptationism  van Fraassen  Stances
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10539-014-9453-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,645
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

In Defense of Pure Reason.Laurence BonJour - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 53 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

More Trouble for Functionalism.Alan Weir - 2001 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (3):267-293.
Scientific Structuralism: Structuralism(s) About Science: Some Common Problems.Bas C. van Fraassen - 2007 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 81 (1):45–61.
Kim's Functionalism.Marian David - 1997 - Philosophical Perspectives 11 (s11):133-48.
An Inconsistency in Functionalism.George Bealer - 1978 - Synthese 38 (July):333-372.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-07-09

Total views
58 ( #126,855 of 2,325,850 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #422,524 of 2,325,850 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature